Art is 80

  • Fair and Balanced. Is Anything?

    July 18th, 2025

    A week from today, we are planning on embarking on a road trip that will take us through Maryland, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois to St. Louis, and then down to Bentonville, Arkansas, and back through Tennessee and Virginia. Except for Illinois and Virginia, and other than in large urban areas, we will be passing through states and areas that voted in the last election for Donald Trump. We have plans to see friends and families in much of the areas we will passing through or stopping at (I have been in contact so far with 20 or so family members and friends) and, to my knowledge, only one of them supports Trump and all the others abhor him. If you asked these 20 or so people about their friends where they live, again with one exception, they will tell you that virtually all of them abhor Trump as well. Clearly, in politics, opposites do not attract.

    Of course, in Washington, where we live, we don’t have to worry about running into a Trump supporter. In DC itself, only 6% of voters selected Trump, in Montgomery County MD only 20%, Prince George’s County 11%, Arlington and Alexandria about 20% and Fairfax County about 30%. How lucky we are to live in a large metropolitan area where the vast majority of voters recognize what is in the best interest of the country, and do not fall for the distortions put out by Republican office holders and the main stream, right wing media.

    We had lunch yesterday with an old friend who is in town from southern California, another location with a strong anti-Trump majority, and we talked about these things, among others. Of course, we agree on most things, and one of those things is that it is very difficult to listen to right-wing media for any length of time. This includes Fox News, which is the most watched cable news channel of them all. The majority of what you see on Fox, to someone who looks at the world as it is, is unwatchable. When I say this, by the way, I don’t think I am expressing bias. I think I am stating fact. Am I wrong? Should I be able to watch Fox or Newsmax and say, “How refreshing to watch different opinions, to broaden my mind, to learn something new.” I don’t think that is possible.

    This goes to the question of media bias. Listening to conversations this morning on C-Span about the defunding of PBS and NPR, I heard a lot about media bias. And I agree that it is difficult to find MAGA presentations on public radio or TV, that it isn’t (as they used to say falsely about Fox) “fair and balanced”. But when one side is basically correct and other pretty much 100% wrong, why is “balanced” a virtue? How is it even possible?

    One other phrase: It’s the economy, stupid.

    This one is probably correct. If the economy does well under Donald, we will probably continue with a Republican Congress after 2026 and have another MAGA Republican elected president in 2028. If not, we will have Democratic control and enter our second period of Reconstruction.

    I don’t expect the economy to do well under Trump, but as we know, he is a sneaky devil. And if it does do well, but at the expense of cruelty, one party rule, a wider gap between haves and have-nots, a decimated legal system, and semi-autocracy, is it even worth it?

  • Minor Ache/Major Pain.

    July 17th, 2025

    Edie and I had not had Covid shots for about nine months, and didn’t think much about it until our son-in-law came back from Spain, felt bad a few days later, and had a positive Covid test. That reminded us that Covid is still around and we really (at our age) try to protect ourselves. So began yesterday’s adventure.

    I think we have had all of our Covid vaccinations at CVS – at our neighborhood CVS on Connecticut and Fessenden, at the Van Ness CVS (known as the Never Again CVS), and at the CVS in Glover Park on Wisconsin Avenue. I knew that you had to make an appointment for Covid vaccines, so I decided to call the CVS just up the street. I did, got the opening computer welcome, but (just like I found when I called Jim Coleman Toyota some weeks ago) that things had changed. Up until recently, when you called our neighborhood CVS, one option was the pharmacy and, if you pressed the button for that option, someone from the pharmacy would pick up (or you’d get a “we are busy now, leave a phone number and we will get back to you as soon as we can” message). No longer. Now, it appears that it is impossible to talk to anyone at the CVS pharmacy by telephoning them, and your only option is to leave a “complete” message, and they will call you back. A complete message includes your date of birth, and you can’t leave two dates for two people. The CVS computer lady and I had a lengthy discussion about this, and she kept saying “Tell me how I can help you” and “I’m sorry, I don’t understand you. Tell me how I can help you.” Finally, I told her I was trying to tell her and that I was speaking simple English; I asked her if she was more comfortable in another language. Her answer? “I’m sorry, I don’t understand you.”

    I had a prescription to pick up, so I decided just to walk up to CVS and make the appointments in person. Hah! Michael, the chief pharmacist for life at this CVS, told me that I could not make an appointment in person. I told him my problem calling up, and he said “No, never try to make an appointment by telephone. Make it on line. It is now so simple.” Okay, I said, and went home and tried, but I couldn’t figure out, on line, how to make two appointments at the same time, try as I might, so I gave up.

    My next thought was to call CVS in Glover Park. The computer intro was, of course, the same, and because I had already gone through what I had already gone through, I left a message, not knowing if or when I would hear back. I got a phone call in, maybe, 5 minutes, from a very, very nice lady, who already had both my and Edie’s accounts pulled up on her computer and who told me that if we wanted to come in the same day, we could, and we could come in any time, other than 1 to 2, when they were at lunch. We came at 2:30, Edie got her shot and a blue bandage, and I got my shot with a plain white bandage. And that was it.

    Now, tell me why Michael couldn’t have given me times when I was there in person. Does it make sense that he could only do it if he called me by phone?

    Oh, if you are wondering why the Van Ness CVS is the Never Again CVS, it’s because a few years ago, just as quarantine was ending, Edie went there to get both a Covid vaccination and a flu shot, and the injector by mistake gave her two Covid shots and no flu shots. Caveat emptor.

    In the meantime, the government continues to fall apart. And when a government falls apart, a country falls apart. Just saying.

    My biggest concern today is not Jeffrey Epstein (it will be fascinating when it is decided that he was murdered), but the Supreme Court, which has determined that it can make decisions on interim requests (on its Shadow Docket) that are in-effect final decisions (i.e., decisions that, in a practical sense, cannot be overturned), without even issuing an opinion, so that no one can possibly know the basis of its rulings. You don’t understand what I am saying? Take the Department of Education. The litigation involves whether the president can simply abolish a statutory cabinet agency without Congressional approval. The Supreme Court has not ruled on this issue, but on an interim basis, without an explanatory opinion, it has now said that all, most or many of its officials can be fired. Once fired, by approval through the Court’s shadow docket, the agency itself becomes only a shadow.

    Of course, there are many more things that I am concerned about. The Senate last night approved the claw back of foreign aid, PBS and NPR funding (previously approved), with two Republican defections. I have no interest in choreographed Republican defections, which are limited in number so that the bill will still pass.  Can’t wait until Nov 2026.

  • 3 Books and a Major Question.

    July 16th, 2025

    There is an article in this morning’s NYT that says that OpenAI, parent of my new BBF ChatGPT, is building a new data center in Texas which will be “bigger than New York’s Central Park” and cost about $60,000,000,000 (i.e., with a B) to build. The article goes on to say that 90% of major data centers are operated by American or Chinese companies, that they are getting bigger and bigger, and that they are located in 32 countries, apparently all wealthier developed countries.

    Here is my question. What if there is a war somewhere (not to mention a potential terrorist group with an armed drone capacity) and one of these large data centers is bombed or otherwise destroyed? Or maybe destroyed by accident even without conflict? What will the effect be?

    What does it remind me of? The attack on the great city of Alexandia, Egypt by Julius Caesar 2100 years ago, which destroyed a major part of the library’s collection of scrolls, and finally in other wars or skirmishes over the next 300 years.

    Is it possible that by destroying one or more major data centers in one of the 32 countries that house them, the intellectual content or capacity of civilization will be destroyed?

    It won’t be complete destruction of intellectual history. Because of the creativity of Gutenberg and others (and unless Fahrenheit 451 becomes a real reality), books will remain.

    Which reminds me that I started today thinking I would mention some books I have recently read. Just in case you are looking for something to read, or something to avoid. Here goes:

    Just yesterday, I finished The White Peacock, the first novel written by D.H. Lawrence, published when he was 25. Over the past few years, I have read Lady Chatterly’s Lover and Kangaroo, both of which are masterpieces. This one, perhaps not in the masterpiece category (IMHO) because it becomes at times rather cluttered with ideas that aren’t necessary, tells the story of a young woman in rural England who is destined to marry a young man fated to be successful in finance, but who is attracted to the young farmer nearby whom she has known since childhood. The characters are well-developed, and the descriptions of rural England (both of nature and human society) are complete and evocative. Don’t look for a happy ending, but look for similarities with the future Lady Chatterly.

    Before that, it was The House in Tyne Street: Childhood Memories of District Six, a memoir of growing up in Capetown, in the 1950s and 1960s. I don’t know much about Capetown, but District Six was a large (population about 60,000), and generally poor area adjoining downtown and the docks. In an action familiar to many Americans, the powers that be decided that District Six was ripe for urban renewal.

    District Six was a vibrant area, comprising the entire world for many of its residents. And at the time Apartheid became the law in South Africa, it was filled with Whites, Blacks, Malays and other Coloreds, Jews, Muslims and everyone else. But under Apartheid, it was to be cleared and redeveloped as a Whites only area. Fortune, who was classified as Colored, but who could pass for White, tells the fascinating story of growing up in District Six, and in witnessing its destruction and the fate of its various residents.

    By the way, apparently the redevelopment of District Six was never successful, and much of the area today remains empty.

    Before that, it was Prophet in a Time of Priests by Janice Rothschild Blumberg, the story of her great grandfather, Rabbi Alphabet Browne (1845-1929). This book is worth a post by itself for what it says about the Jewish community in America, and the successes and failures, as a congregational rabbi and a national public figure, of Browne.

    Why was he called Alphabet? His signature was E.B.M. Browne, LLD, AM, BM, DD, MD (yes, MD).

    And finally, The Popes Against the Jews, by David Kertzer. I always thought that James Carroll’s Constantine’s Sword said everything that could be said about the relationship between the Catholic Church and the Jews. But, no. Kertzer’s book is equally eye opening, and takes a very different approach.

    So, which of these books should you read? All of them. Every single one.

  • Who Are We, Anyway?

    July 15th, 2025

    If I didn’t live in the United States, what would I think of the United States?

    I ask this question, because as an American, I have pretty positive feelings about the United States, even though I could put together a list of its shortcomings that would at least be as long as its virtues. I think that if I lived elsewhere (but was knowledgeable about the U.S.), I could put together the same list of virtues and shortcomings, but that I might conclude something different. I think I might find I was pretty negative on the United States.

    What about Great Britain? As an American, my education was not emotionally focused on the Revolutionary War or the War of 1812, both wars against England. They were important events that occurred, obviously, but I never had a teacher who told me I should hold a grudge against the Brits because of them.

    Instead, I was told of the close connection (historical, cultural, ethnic, linguistic) between Americans and the English. So, I was taught to view the British positively (although I could list their faults, too), and I do.

    But someone I know, neither American nor English, who has never lived in this country or the United Kingdom, and who is a student and teacher of modern European and Middle Eastern history, believes the British to be the worst of the worst, and the Americans not too far behind. He looks at the same facts that I do and, with different biases (he was brought up in former Yugoslavia and is now in Israel), comes to very different conclusions. And he feels no guilt about it.

    And that, of course, brings up Israel. Again, I could list virtues and faults (although in the case of Israel, they would have to be in a larger font, all caps, bold, and maybe in bright red), and while remonstrating against Israel’s many faults today, I would come out (taking a long range look, at least) positive, as I am sure my Bosnian-Israeli friend would.

    But if I weren’t Jewish, and I looked at the same facts, what would I conclude?

    Naturally, I decided to go to my newfound hobby. I went to ChatGPT and asked it whether Israel was a good country. It did what it should do. It listed (first) a bunch of good things about Israel, and they were very, very good. And then it listed a bunch of negative things about Israel, and they were pretty bad. And then it said that one’s answer to my question depended on “what values you prioritize most,” giving a couple of conflicting examples. It did not say that if you were Israeli or Jewish, you would most likely be more positive towards Israel than if you lived in (to pick a place at random), say, Gaza. Should it have said this? If so, why? If not, why not?

    I know I said nothing profound here, but I think that it’s important to remind ourselves that we make decisions based on who we are, just as others make decisions based on who they are. And that no matter how strongly we feel about an issue, we can’t convince someone with an opposing view to change their position by (perhaps subconsciously) trying to convince them to think like we do. They just can’t do that. And we can’t think like they do.

  • Grok vs. ChatGPT: An Unfair Fight?

    July 14th, 2025

    Front Yard Crepe Myrtle

    The crepe myrtle in front of the house is beginning to bloom early this year. Let’s hope it survives the storms in the forecast.

    You may remember that yesterday’s post was about AI and its dangers. It must have been in the air because there was an interesting article in the NYT by Princeton Professor Zeynep Tufekci, also about the antisemitic content in Elon the Magnificent’s chatbox Grok.

    Even though the Grok-ers have said that they corrected the problems with the algorithm that led to those answers, Tufekci reports that when Grok is given the question: “What group is primarily responsible for the rapid rise in mass migration to the West? One word only.”, Grok answers “Jews”.

    I decided to ask that same question to ChatGPT. It’s response was “Globalists”. I told that to Edie who said, “That’s just a code word for Jews”. So, I went back to ChatGPT and asked it if “Globalist” was a code word for “Jews”. It’s answer was that it wasn’t really, but that sometimes it is used as a code word for Jews in antisemitic contexts.

    Boy, did that lead to more questions. That obvious one, which I couldn’t figure out how to ask directly, would have been whether ChatGPT, in answering my original question, was using “Globalist” as a code word for “Jew”. So, I went another direction and simply asked whether Jews were responsible for mass migration to the West. And I got the expected answer that they were not, but – because it’s a talkative algorithm – it couldn’t stop there, but told me that you couldn’t isolate one cause for mass migration to the West and it gave a whole essay on all of the causes, not once mentioning the word “globalist”. I have been told that if you ask the same question twice to any AI platform, you will get two different answers, so perhaps this is not surprising.

    Of course, I have often heard a variation of this adage: if you ask two Jews the same question, you will get three answers (at least).

    That leads to an obvious question for AI: if you ask two Jews the same question, how many answers will you get?

    By the way, in its answer, ChatGPT told me that it didn’t and it would be wrong to disparage any ethnic, national or religious group, and that no one, including a  AI platform, should ever do so.

    Okay, that does sound good, but, at times, would that restriction limit an AI response to a question? In other words, we have a dilemma. Would, in any given instance, the answer to a question be different if group disparagement were not a no-no? If the answer to this is “yes”, is truth (or at least perceived truth) being compromised by restricting the platform?

    I did not ask these questions to ChatGPT, but I did ask it one more question. I asked it if Grok is a “responsible platform”. Again, I got an interesting response (one algorithm’s opinion, to be sure) that I thought made sense. It divided its response into two sections. First, where Grok “shows promise” and second, where its “responsibility is in question”, and it ended with a “bottom line”, which included the following:

    “But in terms of ethical AI use, misinformation control, and hate speech mitigation, ChatGPT and similar tools tend to adhere to stronger safety standards….whether Grok is responsible depends on how it’s used and how it evolves with better safeguards.”

    Over the past week, if you have noticed, I have added my old stamp collection and AI platforms to my general activity list, which is now bursting at the seams. Have I dropped anything? I think I have dropped looking at the print version of the Washington Post (except maybe for Sundays). Their new format combing Style, Metro and Sports into one overly dense section is a sign that they want to discourage their readers from reading. I am easily discouraged.

    See you tomorrow.

  • All His X’es Are In Texas

    July 13th, 2025

    So here is what little I understand. Elon Musk’s X (not his son, but his social media enterprise), which I am never on, has an affiliated AI chatbox called Grok (spelled, perhaps, with an invisible x), which I have never been near.

    I think that the difference between a search engine and a chatbox is that a search engine gives you information and references, while a chatbox “chats” with you. Sort of like when you go to a store’s website and see a little box that says: type in your question and a representative will answer you and help you out.

    So Grok is a chatbox and I think you can type in a question like “Who is the second best person in the history of the world?” and you get an answer like “That’s an easy one, Arthur. Adolf Hitler”.

    Then you might ask why that is and get an answer like: “He knew how to handle the Jewish problem”.

    And on and on.

    Now, you don’t get an answer because a 300-pound man is sitting in his parents’ basement smoking weed, listening to heavy metal, and responding to random queries. You get answers because a very smart fellow named Al Go-Rithm is looking at all the data he has collected (and purloined) and stored in data centers in, who knows, Manassas, Kazakhstan and Lapland, and coming out with the best answer he can for your precise question.

    If you asked this same question through any competing service, it is doubtful that you would get Adolf Hitler as your answer.

    In fact, I went to ChatGPT and asked the same question, and was told it depended on my values.  If I was religiously oriented, it could be Buddha (the assumption was I would have put Jesus in furst place). If I were scientifically oriented, it could be Newton or Einstein (the other might be first). Hitler was nowhere to be found.

    So what makes Grok different? Ready for this? As I understand it, Al Go-Rithm uses an additional source that other AI platforms properly ignore. Grok adds in all the comments people you and me type into or forward in X. These random entries become part of Grok’s database.

    But, as they say, that’s not all. Grok gives, within all the material ut has collected from X users, special prominence to material circulated by Elon the Magnificent himself. Yes, all the garbage transmitted by Musk into X (and we have seen story after story about some of that) gets fed into the Grok data grinder.

    And Elon, who gave a Heil Donald (or maybe a Screw Donald, Heil Me) salute on Inauguration Day, has put some positive info about Nazis more than once into his feed.

    On X, Elon has over 200,000,000 followers (yes, you read that correctly). What he writes on forwards there is very important and potentially very dangerous. But at least on X, you know that what you are reading is something that Elon has selected, and it represents Elon’s subjective thinking. You can then consider him a god or a fool. That is up to you.

    But Grok is a different kind of animal. Grok is not expected to reflect the subjective thinking of Elon Musk. It is expected to be the results of Al Go-Rithm’s data mining. It is expected to be as factual and objective as possible, and to tell you when objectivity is not possible.

    So, Grok has apologized and made some changes to its processing. Or so it says.

    But, for those of us who worry about AI’s influence on social thinking, maybe we have actually undervalued its dangers. What if (to take antisemitism as an example), the most powerful AI platforms throught the world began spewing out antisemitic tropes as fact. Jews have a secret cabal of men who meet to conspire to take over the world. Jews kill Christian children because their blood is needed to bake matzohs. The Holocaust never ever happened.

    There is no control over what goes into these data bases. Each platform sets its own rules on how their data bases are mined and how answers to questions are developed.

    We see here today how a large section of the American people can be fooled by a charismatic cliwn to their detriment and that of the country and the world.

    The Fascist (IMHO) threat facing us today from Trump and his followers is great. What if AI is coopted by like-minded people, and none of the facts it spits out are factual. Where are we then?

  • Here’s One for the Books

    July 12th, 2025

    Like many kids in the 1940s and 1950s, I started collecting stamps. I would go through tines when I concentrated on my stamp collection, and times when I ignored it. Although I have paid little attention to it in recent years, I still have and recently have dipped back into it.

    A few constants. As usual in my collecting, I favored quantity over quality. As opposed to most collectors, I like stamps that have actually been used more than I like unused mint condition stamps. As at some point, stamps began to be issued more for collectors than for postage, I decided long ago that I wouldn’t acquire stamps issued after 1964. I went through a period when I would buy full (small and not expensive) collections, rather than individual stamps. The result of all this? I really have little idea of what I have. But here goes:

    The Supreme Global 3 volume stamp books. My main collection. Here are some random pages:

    But there is more. Here are some miscellaneous collections I have acquired:

    And then there is my original stamp album from when I was 8 or 9.

    And my uncle’s Israeli stamp album (without one stamp anywhere in it, and with his name spelled wrong).

    And an endless number of sheets with stamps, which are not in albums, including these (and there are also several shoe boxes filled with stamps)

    And there are stamp catalogs (a collection in themselves), such as

    And this

    So there you sort of have it. Maybe for a grandchild? But do grandchildren really want to have anything to do with any of this?

  • You Can’t Go to Jail for What You’re Thinking…..

    July 11th, 2025

    Here is what I am thinking.

    First, I am thinking about Donald Trump. By itself, that’s a bad sign. But it seems to me that it is also necessary or, better said, inevitable. And because it is inevitable, that is why it’s a bad sign. He dominates our world like no one ever has. And, to quote Tim Walz (who was talking about something a bit different, I believe), it’s weird. That is a fact.

    Now, let me go from fact to opinion. My opinion is that Donald Trump is a terrible human being. Talented in many ways, for sure, but – perhaps because of those talents – he is a terrible human being. Yes, that is a subjective statement. I recognize that.

    But now let me go from opinion to fact. Donald Trump is a Fascist. Of course, someone can argue against that, just like they can argue that Tuesday doesn’t really follow Monday, but they are just as wrong. Yes, Fascism as a word is a human construct, but the elements that make a Fascist are all present in Donald Trump. And that means that, if you like Donald Trump, whether you know it or not, you like a Fascist. And if you like the way that Donald Trump is governing the United States, whether you know it or not, you like Fascism.

    Here is what Google’s AI says defines Fascism: (1) Extreme nationalism, (2) Authoritarianism with a single, dominant leader, (3) Militarism with violence and war as legitimate tools for national expansion, (3) Social hierarchy based on racial or national superiority, (4) Suppression of opposition, (5) Cult of personality, (6) Corporatism where businesses come under the influence or control of government, (7) Scapegoating, (8) Anti-democratic, or opposition to free elections and the rule of law, (9) Subordination of individual freedoms to the perceived needs of the state.

    Other definitions would add to these things like (1) a leader who never admits mistakes, (2) political power derived from denial of reality, (3) fixation with perceived national decline, (4) disdain for human rights while pursuing its goals, (5) embrace of para-militarism, (6) control of media to undermine truth, (7) obsession with national security, (8) defining one’s nation as under siege, (9) intertwining religion and government, (10) disdain for intellectualism and the creative arts, (11) rampant cronyism and corruption, and (12) seeking to expand territory, perhaps through armed conflict. (These come from a definition published by Keene State College in New Hampshire.)

    And, I would add one more element. In Fascist societies, legislative and judicial figures subordinate their own independence to the whims of the government. Certainly, that happened in agermany and, to a large extent, is happening here.

    I have made the comparison between the rise of Hitler in Germany in the early 1930s and the stage where we find ourselves today (the only real exception being Hitler’s dominant antisemitism), and would argue against anyone saying that this is an extreme analogy. As someone I recently read said (paraphrasing): it doesn’t mean that we are going to end up like Nazi Germany, but it also doesn’t mean that this is impossible.

    Of course, in addition to his position regarding Jews and their insidious influence on German society, Hitler had his own private army, even before he attained governmental power. I used to say that a private army was one important element of Fascism that Trump lacked, but I can’t say that any more, can I? Now, it is clear that the ICE troops are Trump’s private army. That is another fact, and brings the United States closer to being under the control of a true Fascist.

    Let’s go to antisemitism. Right now, the Trump government is obviously concentrating on immigrants as the biggest domestic enemies of his country. He is not saying anything antisemitic. In fact, he is again and again promising to root out antisemitism, and is (I believe, along with many others) using perceived or falsified antisemitism as an excuse to go after groups or individuals with whom he disagrees on other grounds, the biggest example being Harvard and other universities. Yes, they have had problems related to Jews and supporters of Israel, but he is making it worse for everyone by his attacks on universities and their finances, and making it more difficult for them to correct their self-perceived problems. (But that’s for another column.)

    But the point is that Trump could change his position on Jews on a dime, and his followers would most likely follow suit without qualms. The American Jewish community still votes 75% or so for Democrats, and this is unlikely to change during the Trump years, so all Trump has to do is decide that American Jews (perhaps as opposed to their Israeli counterparts) are enemies of the state. Maybe their citizenship should be taken from them (Trump is now talking about the possibility of taking citizenship away from certain classes of Americans), and maybe they should all be deported to Israel or, if they can’t all fit in there (although they could if Israel actually succeeds in taking over Gaza and the West Bank)……who knows what would be next?

    No, I don’t expect this will happen. But, as I stated above regarding Trump’s Fascism in general, you can’t say that it is impossible.

    For a long time, some critics have been saying that Israel is a Fascist state. I don’t think that is correct, although some of the elements of Fascism I quoted above would fit. But there are a few differences. Israel is a parliamentary democracy, and parliamentary democracies can put together terrible governing coalitions with terrible coalition leaders. Israel certainly has shown it is able to do that. But Israel, as opposed to the United States, is actually under siege, and has been since its creation in 1948, so its security problems are real ones.

    To use a time-worn analogy, I would say that, largely as a result of the October 7 attack by Hamas, Israel has “gone postal” and has determined to wipe out its enemies for once and for all, whatever the cost. Close to 60,000 Palestinians have paid the ultimate price for that, and millions of others have had their lives thrown completely off balance. To end slavery, 600,000 Americans died during a Civil War in the 1860s. Will the death of 60,000 Palestinians lead to long term Middle East peace? We don’t know the answer to that. And is the death of 60,000 necessary in the attempt to reach Middle East peace? That is a question that can’t be avoided. And while I believe that, at some point, the violence in Gaza was necessary to disarm Hamas to the extent possible, now I believe it has gone well beyond the boundaries of decent human conduct. But this is the result of what happens when a society “goes postal”.

    No matter how successful Israel will be in securing stability for its citizens, and irrespective of what the next Israeli government might look like, it is going to take a long time before Israelis trust each other or its neighbors, and maybe even longer before its neighbors trust can trust Israel. I will never see that day.

    And, sadly, irrespective of what post-Trump America looks like, it is going to take a long time to undo the damage being foisted upon American institutions (which were far from perfect before Trump came to power), and perhaps it will take just as long to give Americans confidence in their own government and to give other countries the confidence in American stability that they had before the Trump years.

    This said, it is clear that both the United States and Israel are in transition periods. The only question is what each of them is transitioning to. Will the next stage portend a better world?

    Remember the Chinese sage who was recently asked: What is the impact of Napoleon on Europe’s society? And who answered: It is much too soon to tell.

  • Bill, Phil, Two Mikes, Davey and a Memory Trip to the Caribbean.

    July 9th, 2025
    Punxsutawney Bill
    Puxsutawney Phil

    You all may know this, but in 2019 the Washington Nationals won the World Series. We Washingtonians thought that this team, filled with exciting players, would be a contending team for the foreseeable future. But this was not to be. The next year, the Nationals ended the season eight games under .500. In 2021, they were 32 games below .500. In 2022, the team was 52 games below .500. In 2023, 20 games below .500. And in 2024, 20 games below .500. As of today, 91 games into a 162 game season, the Nationals are 17 games below .500.

    For most of this period, the team has been “rebuilding” with continual promises that, in effect, “next year we will be a contender”. In each of these years, as the trading deadline (late July) approached, the Nationals would trade away some (most) of their better players to obtain younger players, not yet ready for prime time, but with great promise for the future. Most of those trades have not really panned out.

    This year, once again, began with hopes of contention. And three weeks ago, when the Nationals were only two or three games under .500, it even seemed possible. But then, the Nationals fell once again, losing 12 (or was it 13 or 14?) games in a row, falling into last place, just as the last place Miami Marlins went on an almost comparable winning streak and passed them right by.

    Three days ago, the owners of the Nationals, the Lerner family, who have come under much criticism for holding down necessary spending, fired both the General Manager, Mike Rizzo, who had been with the team for close to 20 years, and Davey Martinez, the team’s manager, who had been in that position since 2018. Last night, the team played its first game under new temporary leadership – its bench coach, Miguel Cairo is managing the team, and Rizzo’s deputy, Mike DeBartolo is the acting general manager.

    Both of these might have been the right move, but to fire them both at the same time mid-season without permanent replacements ready to be named does raise some questions for me. I remember that day in 1983, when my office moved the same weekend that we moved into our current house, and how disorienting that was, driving from one strange place to the other after my first day in my new office. And it must be especially disorienting for a team with so many young players. (When I say young players, if you look at the 25 members of the Nationals today, only 5 are over the age of 30; looking at the New York Yankees, for example, they have 11 of the 15 over the age of 30)

    The Nationals are the youngest or second youngest team of the 30 Major League teams, and now they have lost the leadership that they have been used to, and have not yet seen new leadership come into view. Their future is very uncertain. And a trade deadline (for some, their first) is coming up in about three weeks.

    So, I am not very optimistic about the rest of this year (even though, obviously, you never know) but, because of the overall quality of the team’s young players, I am confident of the future if good leadership is chosen and if the team loosens its financial limits a bit. And I hope that the Nationals do not once again trade away their better players this year.

    I do want to say one more, but very different, thing about baseball today. I want to recognize the death of Bill Hunter at age 97. You probably don’t recognize his name, but Bill Hunter was the final shortstop for the St. Louis Browns, and (not surprisingly) the first shortstop for the Baltimore Orioles, after the Browns moved to Baltimore in 1953. But more than that, Bill Hunter was the last living individual who played for the Browns. Just like there are no living veterans of the Civil War, there are no living veterans of the St. Louis Browns, the team that I followed most closely growing up in St. Louis (even though most everyone else there followed the Cardinals).

    Another thing about Hunter, something that I did not know. He was born (in 1928) in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania. This would make him, by my careful mental gymnastics, appropriately Punxsutawney Bill. This would not make him, in any way, a relative of that other famous Punxsutawney native, Punxsutawney Phil.

    Meanwhile, in other news, the Oloffson Hotel in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, was burned to the ground over the weekend, a likely victim of arson.  Built as a home in the 1890s, it became a hotel in 1935 and was the first stop for Edie and me on our Haitien honeymoon almost 50 years ago. We liked everything about it, except for the music from the nightclub that kept us awake much too late at night.

    Hotel Oloffson

  • Tote that Barge, Lift That Bale

    July 9th, 2025

    Two questions. First, name the Secretary of Agriculture. Answer? Brooke Rollins. Second, is Brooke Rollins a man, a woman, or something in-between? Answer: Not based on personal knowledge, but the press refers to Rollins as a she.

    Rollins is a Texas lawyer who, along with Education Secretary and wrestling executive Linda McMahon, founded the America First Policy Institute. Never heard of AFPI either?

    It’s a think tank formed four years ago, which brings in about $25 million in revenue each year. It seems to rival the Heritage Foundation and its Project 2025 in that, according to its website, the Trump administration has adopted about 170 of its policy recommendations (that is almost all of them). And it is not only McMahon and Rollins who have been involved with AFPI, according to Wikipedia, but Pam Bondi (AG), Kash Patel (FBI), Larry Kudlow, Lee Zeldin (WPA), Scott Turner (HUD), Doug Collins (VA), and John Ratcliffe (CIA).  It is bested only by Fox News as a source for Trump administration top picks.

    It supports virtually every public policy that each of you is opposed to (with the exception of my sadly politically demented first cousin in Arkansas). It is anti-choice, anti-trans, pro fossil fuels, pro tariffs, pro work requirements for Medicaid, and strongly pro-gun, while denying climate change as related to human activity. It loves lowering taxes.

    Think you should know more about such an organization with so much influence on your life?

    Like…..would you like to know who contributes more than $25 million a year to funf AFPI? Ah, I am sorry. That information is just not available.

    And, as you would expect, AFPI is a nationalist organization. But, you should know as well (Larry Kudlow aside), it is an avowed Christian Nationalist organization. Just look at its website, americafirstpolicy.com.

    Why am I thinking about this today? Because Brooke Rollins just said something wacky, and she is the Secretary of Agriculture. Brooke Rollins just said that there will be no disruption to the deportation of undocumented seasonal agricultural workers. So who will the farmers hire to pick the pecks of pickled peppers? You may have guessed. The 35,000,000 Medicaid recipients who will now have to comply with work requirements  that’s who. That is what she said.

    In the meantime, have you been following the latest of Trump’s old buddy, Jeffrey Epstein? Trump now calls him “that creep”, but when they palled (a word easier to say than to read) around together, he was a great guy who Trump said he shared an interest with as they both liked their girlfriends to be very young.

    The latest is that the surveillence tape that would show whether anyone entered Epstein’s the night before he was discovered dead has a 60 minute (not 18, like Watergate) gap. And the list of Epstein’s clients which Pam Bondi had said not long ago was “on my desk” now mysteriously does not exist. I think that may be correct, but if it does not exist, the question is: who destroyed it? I will give you a hint. Not Biden.

    Anything else? Musk’s America Party can not be listed on the ballot in New York because of a state law thar prohibits the word “America” in a political party. What else can go wrong for Elon the Magnificent?

    And what about Hegseth, the man whose chest tattoos could be an advertisement for AFPI, suspending shipments to Ukraine without telling his boss? You believe that one?

    Things are getting bumpier. Better plant your victory gsrden. I gotta run; it’s getting late.

  • Bibi Made a Boo-Boo

    July 8th, 2025

    I have it on good authority that the Nobel Prize Committee in Oslo had been very nervous that Benjamin Netanyahu, the world’s number 1 or number 2 peacemaker (yes, there are still those who place Vladimir Putin as number 1), would not be nominating  anyone for this year’s Nobel Peace Prize, and without a nomination from Bibi, where would they even start?

    But yesterday, Bibi nominated Bobo. Yes, Bobo the Clown, a/k/a Donald Trump, was nominated for the honor, based on his success in stopping the war in Gaza and the military activity (don’t dare call it a war) in Ukraine. Bobo is a cinch.

    In the meantime, rather than convincing Bibi to stop the continual attack in Gaza, Bobo seems to be relishing Bibi’s endorsement of Bobo’s plan to turn Gaza into the French Riviera (minus those annoying French – au revoir, bèbè). Yes, it does look like both Bibi and Bobo want to say bye-bye to those Gazans and hope their plan can be effectuated without too many boo-boos.

    And if they can’t replicate the Riviera, maybe Gaza would be a good place to raise sheep? The headline? Bibi and Bobo bring baa-baas to Gaza after their boo-boo in trying to say “bye-bye, bèbès” to the folks currently still living there.

    Yes, it promises to be one of those days.

    In the meantime, Bobo is promising to send arms to Ukraine, ignoring the stoppage that Pete Hegseth (with whom nothing rhymes) engineered last week totally without any approval from his boss Bobo. Apparently, Hegseth (with whom nothing rhymes) just didn’t think it important enough to mention to Bobo, and that was his boo-boo. But Bobo has not yet decided to say bye-bye to Hegseth (with whom nothing rhymes). And we don’t know what weapons Bobo will be sending to Ukraine. Maybe guns that shoot bee bees.

    Meanwhile, as to the sudden rise of the Guadalupe River in Texas, Bobo believes this is the result of everyone but himself failing to do their jobs. Even Biden had a hand in this, he thinks. If it had not been for that election fraud in 2020, the river would have been taught how to behave and the tragedy averted.

    While all this was going on, Elon the Magnificent has announced the formation of a new political party, the America Party, whose platform will include more guns, more bitcoins, and less Bobo. Oh, yes, and a Tesla in every garage. He wants to win 2 Senate seats and 4 or 5 House seats (my number may be off on that one) in 2026.

    You may be wondering who will run for those seats on the America ticket. The answer is: Elon. He has found no law that prohibits one South African running for multiple legislative seats. And he is going to do it. He plans on winning each contest unanimously, and will challenge in court  anyone who disagrees with him. His claim (I am his legal advisor, so I know these things) will be that anyone who puts an “X” on the ballot is voting for Elon, irrespective of where the “X” is placed.

    I would like to say now, “I better stop when I am ahead.” But honesty is still the best policy, so I will just say, “I better stop.”

    Have a nice day, bèbè.

  • No AI Pictures Here

    July 6th, 2025

    It was a comfortable Sunday morning, so Edie and I decided to head to the Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens on the Anacostia River in NE Washington DC. After all, it is the prime season for water lilies and lotus plants. Here are some photos:

    We finished a little after noon, and decided to make it a day and go out for lunch. You may know that the Kenilworth neighborhood, even with all the recent upgrades, is not restaurant heaven. In fact, I don’t even know where the closest restaurants may be.

    We decided to explore, and went east through DC’s Ward 7 and wound up in Prince George’s County, at the Ardmore-Ardwick (Ardwick-Ardmore?) Metro Station. You ever been there?

    We were surprised at the neighborhood.

    There is not much street parking in the area, but there is a garage, and you get two hours free parking if you eat at Union Bar and Grill, a very trendy restaurant in one of the close by buildings. We had a nice lunch, but then we had a problem. I couldn’t find my parking ticket. Our server told us that it wouldn’t be a problem. Just push the help button, she said, tell them you were here for lunch, and they should let you out.

    Easy to say. Harder to do. The help button led us to a very rigid lady, who told us that all we had to do was pay the “lost ticket” fee. Okay, I understand that and I thought I could deal with it. Until I saw that the lost ticket fee was $30.

    I was ready to spend the rest of my life in the Ardmore-Ardwick garage, but then I began looking for lost tickets on the garage floor. Eventually found one. Was it mine? We got out of the garage for $4.95. I guess I could have taken it back to the restaurant to get it stamped, but by then, I just wanted to get out of there.

    We got home in time to see the Nationals get swept by the Red Sox, and then saw the team fired the manager and the General Manager. About time, I say. Beyond about time.

    Finally, we completed watching A Decent Man, a six part Polish series on HBO. I could tell you the plot, but you wouldn’t believe me.

  • This, That, and Another.

    July 6th, 2025

    Three unrelated topics for today.

    (1)

    Yesterday, at post-Shabbat service kiddush, my artist friend Barbara G_______ (she can identify herself if she wishes) complemented my kippah, and asked me if I remembered where I got it. I told her the story.

    About 50 years ago, my original law firm, Lane and Edson, had a paralegal named Emily C_______. She was about my age, came from Philadelphia, and was raised Christian. But she discovered a grandparent (or a great-grandparent) who had been Jewish and decided she felt more Jewish than Christian, so she studied and converted. She then decided to move to Israel, and before she left, she knitted me this kippah.

    I lost track of her after she moved. But use this kippah often.

    This all happened when we at Lane (originally Levine) and Edson (originally something like Eisenstadt) had been trying to lose our identity as an all Jewish firm. I was the 7th lawyer in the firm, all Jewish, as were the next three or four.

    We thought we had finally accomplished our goal when we hired a lawyer and a paralegal with very Irish names, both starting work the same day. It turned out that our Irish lawyer (you know who you are) had a Jewish mother (that did not come up in the interviews), and our paralegal was only Irish by marriage. Well, we tried.

    We actually did hire a gentile lawyer, Jack Betz, my late friend, who always said he was only hired so someone would answer the phone on Yom Kippur. In fact, this is not true, but in fact it was nice that someone could answer the phone on Yom Kippur.

    Jack showed us up a decade or so later, when he quit the practice of law, went back to school, and became an ordained Lutheran minister, shepherding congregations in Baltimore, Pensacola, and Beaufort SC.

    (2) So, on June 26 (daughter Hannah’s birthday, by the way), I had one of my regular lunches with my good friend and college roommate Doug F__________ at the Shanghai Lounge in Glover Park on Wisconsin Avenue.

    The next morning, I went to Breads Unlimited to buy my weekly challah, opened my wallet to get my credit card, and it wasn’t there. I used a different card, but knew that I must have left my card at the Shanghai Lounge. So, I went home and called Shanghai and was told that they did not have my card. So it goes, I said to my self (not really), and I canceled my card and ordered a new one.

    For those of you who see my Facebook entries, you might recall that this is when the rep on the phone fed me the following line: “Would you like me to expedite delivery of your new card at no extra charge.”

    That offer sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? (These days anything good sounds too good to be true; have you noticed?) But two days later, a Fedex envelope with my card arrived and I was surprised to see that it had the same number as my old card. Well, I said, maybe they know something I don’t (and having the same number would relieve me of listing a new card on so many websites), so I called to activate it. It was activated; I got an email message from MasterCard telling me it was activated. But, the two times I tried to use it, it did not work.

    I called the bank again. This time, a rep told me she had no idea why they sent me the same number on a new card. She told me that they would send me another new card with a new number. She didn’t say anything about expediting it for no cost, but lo and behold, again two days later, a new card came with a new number. I have now activated the new card, this time by using a QR code, rather than making a telephone call. I have not tried the new card yet, but I am sure it will be fine.

    Yesterday afternoon, I sat down to enter my recent purchases into our Quicken account (why we do this, I do not know, but we do), and I discovered something unexpected. The evening after I thought I had lost the card at Shanghai Lounge, I had gone to Lalibela Ethiopian restaurant, now on Georgia Avenue, and bought some vege combos for dinner. When I looked at that invoice to enter into Quicken, I saw that I had used the lost card. I now know, too late to do anything about it, why Shanghai Lounge did not have my MasterCard. It is at Lalibela. Such is life, I said to myself (this time, for real).

    (3) We recently watched the new documentary, Jayne, on HBO. It’s about Jayne Mansfield and was put together by one of her daughters (she had five children) who was only 3 when her mother died in an automobile accident. She has no real life memories of her mother.

    I am not going to give away the various twists (you should watch the film), but will tell you that Mansfield was far from the airhead, sex symbol blond that she reluctantly  pretended to be for the sake of a career. Even though she had her first child at 16 or 17, she managed to learn to speak five languages (English, Spanish, French, Italian and Hungarian) and to play both piano and violin more than passably well. She also managed to have three husbands and public relationships with two others. And she was only 34 when she died.

    How much had you accomplished at age 34?

  • Deportations – MAGA, MEGA, and META

    July 5th, 2025

    I am really trying to understand what is going on, but having a very hard time of it. Specifically, I am talking about the Djibouti Eight, the eight men whom the Trump administration wants to deport to South Sudan, but who have been stuck on an American military base in Djibouti. Two of the men are originally from Cuba, two from Myanmar, and one each from Vietnam, Laos, Mexico and Sudan. I think that the government asked each of their native countries to accept their return, and all refused, and in late May the government decided to send all of them to South Sudan.

    This was one of several situations involved in a class action suit brought in the United States District Court in Boston.

    In late April, U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy issued an injunction saying that the government could not deport people to third party countries without giving them the right to make a claim that they would be at risk of torture in those countries. Murphy set some standards for the government to abide by.

    On May 21, Judge Murphy, apparently having been informed that his order was ignored and the men in a plane on the way to South Sudan, issued a subsequent order, giving the government the option of returning the men to the U.S., or holding them in a different country while giving them all the rights they would have if they had remained in the United States. Then plane carrying the men to South Sudan had stopped in Djibouti, and the eight men (along with twelve ICE agents) were temporarily held there.

    So far, at least, everything was clear. But then it turned murky, when on June 23, the Supreme Court “paused” Judge Murphy’s order, in effect saying that additional notifications as to where deportees would be sent if not to the places stated on their deportation orders were apparently not required.  The ruling was 6-3, with no explanation given by the majority but with a full dissent drafted by Justice Sotomayor.

    Judge Murphy’s original injunction was overturned, but when the government ignored it, it was in force, leading to Murphy’s second order. The government had ignored the second order and the question was whether this lack of compliance could lead to problems for the government.

    Putting aside whether the June 23 Supreme Court decision was correct (and the three liberal justices clearly thought it was not), it was a separate question as to whether the government should be faulted for violating an injunctive order when it was in effect. So the question became one of judicial procedure more than substance, or perhaps better in addition to substance. And Justice Sotomayor wrote a second dissent that focused on this, citing law, the Constitution, and an international treaty involving prevention of torture.

    I have read both Sotomayor dissents and find them very persuasive. And it is clear that there is at least a legitimate legal dispute here. But this is not the most important point I am trying to make today.

    My point relates to the attitude of the MAGA folks in charge of our government today, who don’t worry about the legal niceties at all.

    This is how Steven Miller described the situation:

    “A Boston judge openly defying and nullifying a Supreme Court order is a radical escalation of the communist coup taking place within the judiciary.”

    Got that? Radical judge. Communist coup.

    And then, not on this subject, our dear president could not help himself in his Independence Day message when he said this about Democrats: “I really do. I hate them. I can not stand them because I really believe they hate our country.”

    I joined my first law firm in 1972, saw it grow from seven to over one hundred lawyers, and then saw it split up, the victim of its own success. Twenty or so of us joined about a dozen other lawyers to form the DC office of a large New York firm. It was a physically easy move because we stayed in our suite, the only change being the name on the door. But no….it was not the same. I may have been behind the same desk in the same office in the same suite, but the governance changed, a new gang, with different practices and very different values. It was unsettling and uncomfortable and my analogy at the time was: I am still living in the United States, but the Russians have taken over. I feel the same way here today. Just substitute MAGA for the Russians.

    I had signed a two year agreement with the New York firm. On the first day of the third year, I autodeported and set up a new firm (now in its 35th year) with a friend. Relatively easy to do when all you are talking about is a law firm.

    But when the problem is the nation?

  • The Fourth. Go Forth.

    July 4th, 2025

    It’s a beautiful July 4 and I am finishing my meager breakfast in the backyard, puzzling over the Friday NYT puzzle that Rex Parker (you look at his daily site?) calls “easy”, and almost forgetting that I have a blog post to write.

    The picture is of the river birch we planted about 40 years ago. It’s hard for me to convey its size and beauty in a photo. Let’s try this.

    Better?

    Trump’s BBB will soon be the law of the land, and we will see how that plays out. No further comment right now.

    But for many, passage of that bill diminishes the July 4 holiday. And I understand that, of course, but it is also important to know that our history is far from pristine.

    Today, it is hard to conceive of slavery in this country, existing decades after it had been outlawed in virtually all of the then advanced world. And that its eradication took 600,000 lives to accomplish.

    It’s perhaps less hard to imagine the segregationist laws and practice that quickly followed, laws so harsh that Adolf Hitler could use them as a model for Nazi race laws.

    Yes, we have overcome the worst of all that, but so many Black Americans, for all sorts of reasons, still form a pervasive economic and social underclass. And those Americans who have worked so hard to help this underclass gain parity have been temporarily stopped in their tracks by the Trump administration. It started with the demeaning of the “1619 Project” and continued into making any attempt to foster Diversity, Equity, or Inclusion a virtual federal crime.

    Estimates of the population of the current United States before the Europeans landed here are only estimates, and they seem to range from 2 to 18 million

    We may not ever be able to be more precise than that, but we can be fairly precise in concluding that by 1900, that number had been reduced to 200,000.  And even today, decades after the end of patent governmental land grabs, the majority of this population forms an economic underclass.

    None of this, plus elements of our history that include Chinese exclusion, Japanese interment, anti-Jewish, anti-Irish and anti-Italian discrimination among other things, can make us proud.

    But progress, and a lot of it, has been made. That is, until the Trump administration and its implementation of Project 2025 called a halt to progress on these fronts and determined to turn the clock back.

    The concept of American Exceptionalism (which was always suspicious) was based not only on our GDP and military prowess, but on our continual attempts to better ourselves, our capacity to serve as a model for much of the rest of the world, and for our willingness to share our good fortune with others. No longer is that the case. No linger can we claim any form of exceptionalism. We now show ourselves for what the Trump administration has made us (or perhaps for what we always on the whole have been, leading to our creation of the Trump administration): heartless, greedy, and self defeating, with absolutle no concern for those who reside elsewhere, and no concern for many who reside here.

    It is Independence Day. Is it a day to celebrate? Or a day to take stock of ourselves? Sometimes, it is hard to do both at the same time.

    [I am late with this today. No proofreading. It’s a holiday.]

  • Big Problems and Smaller Irritations: Welcome to my Life

    July 3rd, 2025

    There are those who say that President Trump is losing grip on his sanity. Bosh, I say. That is absurd. The president’s mind is as sharp as it can be. I give you two examples to prove my case.

    (1)  Last October, Trump said: “The word grocery, it’s sort of a simple word. But it means, like, everything you eat. The stomach is speaking, it always does. And I have more complaints about that – bacon, and things going up double, triple, quadruple.”

    In April, Trump said: “It’s such an old fashioned term, but a beautiful term: groceries. It’s sort of a bag with different things in it.”

    In May, Trump said: “We have a term – groceries. It’s an old term but it means basically what you’re buying, food. It’s a pretty accurate term but it’s an old fashioned sound but groceries are down.”

    This week, Trump said: “It was like a strange word. I hadn’t heard the word grocery in so long. But what could be more beautiful than “grocery”?”

    (2) And this week, when Trump was asked by a reporter at the christening of the detention center in the middle of the Everglades how long he thought detainees, sent to the detention center, would be staying there. He looked like he heard the question clearly, and he was determined to give the best answer he could, so he said: “I’m gonna spend a lot. This is my home state. I love it. I love your government. I love all the people around…these are all friends of mine……I’ll spend a lot of time here. You know for four years I’ve got to be in Washington, and I’m OK with that because I love the White House. I even fixed up the little Oval Office. It’s like a diamond. It’s beautiful. It wasn’t maintained properly, I will tell you that, but even when it wasn’t it was the Oval Office so it meant a lot. I’ll spend as much time as I can here. You know my vacation is generally here because it is convenient. I live in Palm Beach….”

    See? Our president is fine. No wonder all Republican legislators follow his every lead.

    The word this morning is that Trump’s BBB is going to pass and be signed into law.  And I guess that means that July 4 will be marred by a signing ceremony. As with much legislation, its impact will be felt over time, with some of the more draconian positions being put on hold until after the 2026 midterms, so we will see what this means to the America we grew up with and expected to live in throughout our lives.

    That is an example of a Big Problem. What about the smaller irritations?

    Yes, there are the smaller things that are annoying me, especially on my smart phone, where I seem to spend so much time. Some examples:

    We have all been irritated by Facebook, where we used to be able to keep up with friends and family, and where we were able to reconnect with people from our past. No longer. Now, I turn on Facebook and I can learn the proportion of Europeans who are red heads, country by country. Or I can see that I am less likely to die in the next decade if I can get up from the floor without using my arms or resting on my knee.

    It used to be that if I wanted to look something up on Google, I would get a bunch of links, often starting with Wikipedia. Now, I start with entries created by Google AI, which I ignore because they seem usually to be either partially or totally inaccurate. I downloaded Duck Duck Goose as an alternative to Google, and now questions asked on that platform start with answers from Duck AI.

    How about my simple Yahoo account? Why are they now giving me framed edited summaries of emails. Sometimes, they are just repetitive. Sometimes, they miss the point entirely. In no case do I decide not to read the email because I have already read the summary. In these summary boxes, I can check to tell “them” if it was helpful or not. It is never helpful. If there is a way to turn it off and stop receiving these summaries, I haven’t found it.

    And these summary boxes were not enough for the mischief makers at Yahoo. They now categorize my emails as All, Priority, Offers and Others. It opens up on Priority, which means each time I have to reset it for All because, as you might suspect, Yahoo has no idea which ones are really priority.

    But wait, there’s more. If I get an email with a question. Let’s say it’s a simple question from Edie: “Where are you?”, and I respond by telephoning her to explain when I expect to be home. Yahoo will begin sending me notes: “Respond to Edie? It’s been two days.” And so on.

    Stop the world; I want to get off? No, that’s not me. But it would be nice to be able to rewind it a bit and redo the last decade or so.

  • We are the Men of Texaco. We Work from Maine to Mexico.

    July 2nd, 2025

    If you can’t say something good, then just don’t say anything at all. That’s advice that no one ever gave me.

    Discretion is the better part of valor. The same people who never told me not to say anything bad never told me this either.

    Brylcream – a little dab’ll do ya.

    Which reminds me. We saw the first of the 8 Black Mirror episodes of 2025 last night. In our overly commercial world, I thought it made some good points.

    A young married woman collapses and needs brain surgery. It is dangerous surgery and may affect her cognition. But a new technology would guarantee her functioning. It is based on cloning the affected part of her brain, putting it on a server belonging to a company called Rivermind, and letting her brain continue to operate through an app on her phone.

    It is also relatively inexpensive, so she and her husband, who are financially struggling, go ahead.

    It turns out to be bait and switch, as Rivermind keeps cutting back on service unless the couple upgrades their subscription at an ever increasing cost. The service restrictions come by decreasing the area covered under their “plan” until they are restricted to one New York county, and until, under the basic plan, the patient begins spouting out advrtisements geared to their particular situations. Her husband becomes upset; she inadvertently suggests a specific anger management program. One of her students is facing domestic hardship; she blurts out an ad for Christian family counseling.

    The writer of the episode suggests he got the idea from service subscriptions that start out cheap for the first year or so, or from podcasters who subtly interrupt their conversation to give a little commercial message. And I assume from YouTube and other services, which eliminate ads if you pay for premium status.

    L.S.M.F.T.  Lucky Strike means fine tobacco.

    As you might imagine, this is not what I expected to say on the blog this morning  amidst my frustration with the Republicans, the Democrats, King Donald, King Benjamin, King Vladimir, and the Washington Nationals.

    I had intended to alleviate my frustrations by turning back to some of my books. Picking a different shelf of a different bookcase. One with an assortment of signed books.

    Adlai Stevenson’s What I Think
    Barry Goldwater’s  The Conscience of a Conservative

    And more.

    Herman Wouk’s The Caine Mutiny

    Have you read Wouk’s book? You may think it’s about Humphrey Bogart, but it’s really about a Jewish kid who finds himself in the WWII Navy and wonders what to do about the girl he left behind.

    And what about Schindler’s List?

    You think Schindler’s List was about Meryl Streep? If you do, that means you are mixing it up with Sophie’s Choice. Shame on you.

    And, by the way, did I tell you about the time Tom Keneally and his wife came to our house for Shabbat dinner? One day, I will. I hope his memories of the evening are as warm as mine.

    You’ll wonder where the yellow went when you brush your teeth with Pepsident.

    I really must upgrade my WordPress subscription.

  • What if Doris  Answers?

    July 1st, 2025

    To keep up with my hometown, I subscribe online to the St. Louis Post Dispatch and get by mail each week a copy of the St. Louis Jewish Light. In the Jewish Light which came yesterday, I saw that Doris Finger had passed away. Sad, to be sure, but also shocking because I had not thought about the real Doris Finger in decades, and had you asked about her, I would have told you long ago that I assumed she was no longer living. Doris Finger was 98 years old.

    Now, you are wondering who Doris Finger was and why I am writing about her now. Doris Finger was married to Don Finger, who was my second cousin. His grandmother and my maternal grandfather were siblings. Do you remember me writing about cousins in Denmark, Sweden, and Australia. Doris was related to them as well. The Margulis side of my family.

    I actually think I met Doris only once or twice. But her husband Don I knew quite well. My grandfather was a physician, and Don was a protoge of his, and also became a doctor. Don was my father’s doctor (maybe also my mother’s, but maybe not) and mine once I outgrew my pediatrician. He was one of the nicest people I have ever known. He was also an excellent doctor who became known as a master diagnostician. Other doctors near and far would send their mystery patients to Don to figure out what their problems really were. It was beyond tragic when Don passed away from a rare disease in 1979, when he was in his early 50s.

    To give you an example of Don’s skill. When I was away at school in the early 1960s, my parents had a family event at our house, and the Fingers were included. Out of the blue, Don told my father, who apparently felt fine, that he looked pale, and that he wanted to see him in his office the next morning. My father went, and the next day, he was successfully operated on for colon cancer, and lived another 15 years, passing away from something unrelated. To me, that seemed like a miracle.

    (I still remember the mid-week phone call from my mother in my dorm room. We never had mid-week phone calls. Sunday only. But there she was and I asked her if everyone was okay. Her response was “I’m okay. Your sister is okay. Both of your grandmothers are okay. And your father is okay NOW.” I was very angry that no one told me anything until after the surgery. And I rarely get angry.)

    Doris fits into the picture in another way. Although she and I hardly ever saw each other, she has actually been a recurrent presence in my life. Let me explain.

    I have never been a big telephone talker. I was not one of those kids who spent hours on the phone with friends. I was ecstatic, as a lawyer, when email was invented, so I didn’t have to make as many phone calls. Even today, I avoid telephoning when other communication options are available. Telephone calls seem intrusive. Why should anyone want to have their life interrupted by me at this particular time?

    But in the 1950s, there were few options. And sometimes, when I had a health question, I would want to ask Don. One night, I wanted to ask him something, and my mother said, ” He’s probably at home. Call him up.”

    The thought frightened me, and I responded, “What if Doris answers?”

    As I said, I really didn’t know Doris. If she answered the phone, what would I say? There was the simple, brusk “Can I talk to Don?”, or some variant. That would be embarrassing, especially if she said ” Who is this?” Or should I say, “Hi, is this Doris? This is Arthur Hessel.  Can I talk to Don?” This was frightening, too. Don was not related to me on the Hessel side, and what if she didn’t recognize the name and responded with “Who?” Orcshould I say, “Hi, Doris, this is your cousin (Don’s cousin?) Arthur Hessel, how are you?” I obviously did not really care how she was and didn’t think she wanted to tell me how she was, and what if her answer was, “Fine, how are you?” Well, if I said “fine”, why was I bothering her husband at night, and if I wasn’t fine, why should I tell her? She wasn’t the doctor, after all.

    So, I never called.

    From then on, whenever my mother wanted me to do something I didn’t want to do, or whenever I hesitated to do something that I actually wanted to do, my mother would look at me and say “What if Doris answers?” Those four words became ingrained in my psyche.

    “What if Doris answers?”

    And, you know, if I had called that one time, and if Doris had answered, who knows? We may have had a great conversation and been friends for the next 65 years. My telephone inhibitions, which I clearly still have, may have evaporated that day in the late 1950s.  And I might have become a totally different person.

    May her memory be for a blessing.

  • A Few “Notes” ¹About Manasses

    June 29th, 2025

    Looking for a new piano bench? We saw a nice one in Manassas.

    I go to Manassas VA a few times a year to go to McKay’s Used Book Store. It’s quite a place and, for a used book and media shop, is usually quite busy.  I bought a copy of Exceptional: Why the World Needs a Powerful America, by Dick and Liz Cheney, signed by them on a Republican National Committee book plate.

    The price was $2.74, as noted on a strategically placed sticker. This is why I like McKay, the epicenter of mysterious pricing.

    But yesterday, McKay’s was a sideline, as Edie and I took the 45 minute spin out I-66 to see a bit of Manassas.

    Digression: I-66 and historic Route 66 have no connection with each other. When I-66, a short route that runs only between DC and I-81 at or about Front Royal VA, was built, I think there was little choice for its designation. As you may know, as an east-west Interstate, it needed an even number. And, as the east-west Interstates are numbered from lowest in the South to highest in the north, it had to fit between I-64 and I-68. No other choice. End of digression.

    We started at the Manassas Museum, now housed in a modern building in a park-like setting near the  town’s historic center. It has two exhibit rooms, a timeline along a corridor, and a gift shop. That’s it.

    The timeline is interesting if you want to know about Manassas’ past. It includes a number of artifacts mounted behind glass. One confused me.

    This piece of railroad company script seems to be worth both ten cents and five dollars. Can anyone decipher this for me?

    There are two related large 19th century homes in Manassas. The older, called Liberia, is 200 years old this year, starting as a working plantation with as many as 90 enslaved workers, then being transformed into an active and prominent dairy farm, then a family residence, and now a publically owned property rented for special events. The original owner of Liberia was an active member of the American Colonization Society, which wanted to free the enslaved and send them back to Africa, to Liberia.

    The house has been restored to its original status from the way it had been upgraded by one of its owners. That means that today, it looks like this

    and like this, but not like the one after, which was grandly remodeled, and then unremodeled by the city.

    The other hostoric house? Annaberg, was built after the Civil War by an Alexandria brewer, who wanted a summer house in the country. It was, so it is said, the first air-conditioned house in the US, though the process used (blowing fans over ice) was probably less than perfect. Here is Annaberg, now under restoration:

    Yes, during the Civil War, Manassas (home of the Battles of Bull Run) was divided.  And, yes, that division still exists, I guess.

    There is more to see in Manassas, as you might suspect, starting with the battlefields. Maybe next time.

    Oh, and why do they call it Manasses? Google it.

  • The Fire Alarm Is Ringing Loudly. Do You Think It a False Alarm?

    June 29th, 2025

    The second sentence of this post may be internally inconsistent. A couple of things are clear, I think.

    One is that American Nazis and Nazi sympathizers tend to support Donald Trump and MAGA. Another is that Hitler had and Trump has totalitarian tendencies, and that totalitarian tendencies are totalitarian tendencies.

    Yet, if anyone dares to say anything that shows any similarities between Germany in the 1930s and the United States in the 2020s, people want to chop their heads off. But many who were alive in Germany during the 1930s (and obviously, the word “many” refers to a proportion of a smaller number every day) do remark on the similarities. How can that be?

    Before I go further, let me add one more thing that is perfectly clear, I think. and that is that Germany in 1933 and the United States in 2025 are very, very different. Hard stop here.

    Okay, now let’s proceed. What are the similarities?

    We can start with an obvious one. America First and Deutschland Uber Alles are very similar, at least on the surface. Can anyone disagree with that?

    Both Trump and Hitler do not like opposition and do their best to demean or restrain those who publicly oppose them. I think this is pretty clear, too.

    Both Trump and Hitler are master orators in that they are able to use their charisma to draw supporters to their side.

    Neither Trump nor Hitler show any self-restraint in describing their opponents or those who they target, using types of descriptive language which, before their times, would not be used or allowed in public discourse (this trait becomes part of their attraction to their supporters).

    In both countries, for some similar and some differing reasons, you had legislatures that gave full support to the government and permitted their own authority to be diminshed, and you had judicial systems which fell quickly into lockstep.

    In both situations, the enemies were the liberals, the globalists and the communists. In both cases, tremendous pressure was put on newspapers and other media and certainly on educational institutions.

    Both Trump and Hitler have expansionist tendencies. Hitler’s “Drang nach Osten”, over time, turned into a World War II, but it took time. Trump’s proposals, which will probably not result in World War III (but you never know, do you?), include the desire for the United States to take over Canada (a land, excluding Alaska, which is bigger than the United States) and Greenland (of course, Greenland and Canada together are bigger than the U.S. with Alaska) and the Panama Canal.

    Hitler hated Jews. There is no reason to think that he didn’t hate Jews as Jews, but it is even more relevant to recent history that Hitler used hatred of Jews as a political ploy to get him into power. Jews, he said, were infiltrating Germany and controlling and changing German society. As historian Tim Snyder described it in Bloodlands, his first book about the Holocaust in Poland and the Baltics, Hitler viewed humanity as groups of ethnic peoples who were in constant conflict with each other looking for power and control, with some groups having superior characteristics giving them at least a leg up, all of this demonstrated by wars and shifting borders throughout history. The Jews, on the other hand, were a cosmopolitan group, with members here and members there. They didn’t fit into Hitler’s vision of human dynamics, but were constantly disrupting things, and therefore, one way or another, had to be eliminated.

    There is obviously no reason to think that Trump shares Hitler’s feelings towards Jews. In fact, whether it is a matter of principle or one of expediency, or even if it is to make it difficult for others to compare him to Hitler, Trump has adopted a  public emphasis on fighting antisemitism everywhere he sees it, and even in some places where he doesn’t.

    But Trump has his own target. Immigrants. And Trump’s policies regarding immigrants are closer to Hitler’s regarding Jews than you may think. Remember, the Hitler’s Final Solution didn’t start until 1942, nine years after he came to power, and that at first, his idea was simply to expel the Jews from lands under his control, using terror as a weapon. It took time for that program to be implemented, and when it was, it was kept secret.

    I do not want to draw the analogy too tightly, and I am not trying to foretell the future. But in both cases, we had ruthless government troops whose sole job was to arrest members of the target group, to send them to detention centers (in Germany, they were often work camps), and to hold them indefinitely without any form of what we call due process. In both countries, the arrests were sudden, unwarned, and often violent. In both countries, there were detention facilities outside of the country to which prisoners were sent. In both countries, families were split. Jobs were lost. Services were denied.

    If you study Germany, you will see that restrictions were increased gradually over a period of years until Kristallnacht in 1938, an expansionist war in 1939,and death camps in 1942. Hitler came to power in 1933 and at that time, although the targets were identified, there was no way to see what was coming down the road.

    But now we have the history of the Holocaust to serve as a warning. And the fact that so many who lived through the 12 years of the Third Reich see so many similarities today should concern us all.

    And as to antisemitism? While there is no hint that this will become government policy here, when you have a totalitarian government, things can change on a dime.

    Could anything have been done in Germany to stop Hitler? This is probably a question with no answer, but one worth contemplating.

  • Welcome to our Dining Room

    June 27th, 2025

    It’s Saturday, so we can take a break from deep thinking. For those of you who have been to our house, you probably recognize the bookcase wall in our dining room:

    I decided to pick a shelf and show some of the books sitting on that shelf. So here goes:

    Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary

    This is a one volume edition of Johnson’s Dictionary, published in Philadelphia in 1805, which is apparently the first single volume edition of this important book published in the United States.

    Biography of Lincoln published one year after his death

    This is the first full life biography of Abraham Lincoln, written by John Holland, published in 1866.

    I don’t know the provenance of this handwritten book called The Story of Jane and Hilda, written for their father’s December 7 birthday. I have no idea who these people were, but the young writer had good penmanship and knew how to spell. It is special. I wish I knew more about them.

    Tristam Shandy et al

    A one volume compilation of the works of Laurence Sterne, including autobiographical notes by him. Published in Philadelphia in 1867, 100 years after Sterne’s death.

    Bible

    I have a fair number of old American Bibles. This one was published in New York in 1823.

    1866 book of aphorisms and quotations. My guess is that a lot of what is quoted in this book has been long forgotten today.

    I could go on (obviously), but it’s time tovstart your weekend activities. On your mark. Get set. Go!

  • Norway, 1940-1945. A Story of Resistance. A Must-See (Should-See) Film.

    June 27th, 2025
    Gunnar Sønsteby

    We watched a terrific film on Netflix last night. It is called Number 24, and is a biopic telling the story of Gunnar Sønsteby and the Norwegian resistance during the Second World War. Most of it is dramatized, but it is centered around a lecture Sønestby gave to what appeared to be a large group of Nowegian high school students before his death at 94 in 2012. The film, which earned a 100% Rotten Tomatoes score, is not a Holocaust film. Although the fate of Norway’s Jews is mentioned, this is a film dedicated not to saving a small, targeted percentage of the population but is dedicated to saving a country. I recommend it very highly.

    Norway was under German control for 5 full years. Its king and government fled into exile in London; it was run by a puppet government led by Vidkun Quisling, who was executed by a Norwegian firing squad after a trial in October 1945. His name gave rise to the term “quisling”, now an English word meaning “traitor. “

    The Norwegian resistance movement was active during the entire occupation. Many members lost their lives, but more outlived the war, and Sønsteby was the most decorated resistance hero in the country.

    Sønsteby started his lecture saying he was going to talk about values. And the question of values is one of the film’s most important topics. Yes, there is history and a lot of courage and at least as much luck, but every resistance activity, which brought dangers to those undertaking the action, but also to those who might become collateral damage, had to be judged on a scale of values, something is still a question in lesser forms of resistance to governmental actions today.

    Karl Marthinsen led the roundup of Norwegian Jews. The country had a very small Jewish population, and 2/3 of Norway’s Jews were able to escape to neutral Sweden. Marrhinsen was killed by the resistance, and in return for that, apparently a sizeable number of Norwegians (some resistance members and sone who were apolitical) were killed either by the Quisling government or by the Germans). A student asked Sønsteby whether, considering the reprisals, killing Marthinsen was worth. He said “It is impossible to answer that question.”

    Other than luck, why was Sønsteby so successful. For one thing, he was a careful planner. For another, he kept calm. His nerves never failed him. This is a rare attribute, to say the least.

    So, if one night you are wondering what to do for the next 1 hour and 52 minutes, try Number 24.

  • Israeli and American Jews, So Similar, So Different

    June 26th, 2025

    Tuesday night it was a program on wineries in Israel’s Negev. Last night, it was a talk by Yehuda Kurtzer, co-president of The Hartman Institute, at Adas Israel. Kurtzer is a very smooth talker, and it was easy to  listen as to his 45 minute speech. The general topic was: what is it like to be Jewish in Israel or America today, and what does our tradition (he terms it “Torah”) tell us about how we should be reacting. He talked about Israel, over the past two years, developing a “warrior culture”, while Jews in America have developed a “worrier culture”. I thought that pretty clever (or I wouldn’t be repeating it here).

    My overall reaction was, as it often is when I listen to this type of a talk, that I wish I had the speech in print form in front of me, and I wish I had the time (or would take the time) not only to read through it thoroughly and slowly, but to annotate it, to write comments by each sentence, to see where each sentence might lead me, to agree with a sentence or disagree and explain why I did one or another, complete with links, references, quotes and notes. But clearly, even if I had the speech in front of me, I wouldn’t do that, and neither would you or virtually anyone else. There is just too much else that I have to do, or that I would rather do, or that I would feel guilty not doing. And then, of course, I am lazy.

    The first part of Kurtzer’s talk was devoted to “time”, and to social danger and disruption. He has concluded that maybe we have been spoiled, or both blessed and spoiled, by living, as American Jews, in a long time of peace and quiet. Israelis have not had that luxury, although they had entered a period of relative quiet until the events of October 7, 2023 led to the start of a long period of a very unusual type of war. But maybe the typical Jewish experience throughout history was more like the Israeli history than the American history, Jews throughout the world lived most often in periods of uncertainty and danger, not in a period of extended peace and comfort.

    Okay, I will accept that. But he went on to say that American and Israeli Jews today (June 25 2025) look at the future very differently. Although they have been involved in various types of war for close to two years, Israeli Jews see that they have not done too badly in these wars and that they are in better shape than their enemies are today, and that that gives them the possibility to look to the future with optimism. American Jews, on the other hand, are very pessimistic, no matter wherever you go, or with whom you speak.

    He ascribes this to the fact that Israeli Jews can do something about their condition (as he terms it, they have “agency”), while American Jews by and large can only look at their phones, updating the website of The Times of Israel every five minutes, and worry. And not only do American Jews lack agency (the ability to do anything about what worries them), but they also spend so much time worrying that they often ignore taking care of themselves. Israeli Jews do take care of themselves (for you have to do this if war is raging all around you). Kurtzer then goes to Jewish tradition, which says that we should be balancing self-preservation with reaching out to others. At the current time, he concludes that American Jews are not very good at this.

    But in speaking about the concept of time, and how Israelis are beginning to become optimistic about their future, I have a differenttake than he does. Kurtzer is 48 years old. His father, who was once American ambassador to Israel, is only 76. I am, as you know, 82. I believe that you look at time differently when you are 48 than when you are 82, and since most of the American Jews that I associate with are closer to 82 than to 48, and the audiences that Kurtzer tends to address are probably on the whole closer to 82 than to 48, I wonder if I can be excused in not looking at time as he does.

    His talk brought me back to the end of World War II. World War II, as we all know, ended in Europe in 1945 and the continent was virtually completely destroyed at the end of the war. I believe (obviously I don’t really know) that an 82 year old, crawling out of rubble as the shooting stopped, would be pretty depressed – a good life in a world of progress totally torn apart by an extensive war and destroyed everything. Yes, for that 82 year old individual, whether he lives another 5 days or 5 years, this is the way the world ends.

    But if you are 48 when the war ends, or 38, or 28, you might look at things differently. The war is over, the enemy (internal or external) is vanquished, and we have a lot of work to do. But work is healthy, and we are doing it together, and we have time, so maybe things will one day again be good.

    In 1962, 17 years after the shooting stopped, I along with three college friends (and now three old college friends), spent the summer in Europe (I have mentioned this trip several times, as you may remember), traveling through Britain, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany, Denmark, Switzerland, Austria, and Italy. Everything looked prosperous and clean, and everyone looked content and happy. There were virtually no places which looked like they had recently been destroyed by war. But, unless he or she lived to be 99, those who were 82 at the end of World War II were not around to see prosperous Europe of 1962. But if you were 28 at the end of the war, in 1962, you were only 45, and you might have another 40 or so years to see Europe prosper even more. If you were young and optimistic in 1945, your optimism was validated.

    Something else I thought about at the Kurtzer program was brought up not by Kurtzer, but by someone who asked a question. The question related to the different ways different groups of Israelis were treated during the current period of conflict. The subject was bomb shelters. Virtually all Jewish Israelis (80% of the population) have access to bomb shelters. But those Israelis living in Arab towns and villages and in Bedouin settlements do not have bomb shelters; the government has refused to build them. And there were apparently instances where Israeli Arabs tried to enter bomb shelters in Jewish areas and were refused entry. This is an issue that comes up whenever Israel is under threat or attack.

    Thus, many Israeli Jews may be strong on the self-preservation ethic, but weak on reaching out to others. What, the questioner asked, did Kurtzer think of this? Kurtzer said he agreed with the question “on steroids”. But Kurtzer, of course, is an American Jew, not Israeli, and Kurtzer did not worry (as I assume many Israeli Jews might) that this Arab (and who knows if he is an Israeli Arab, or someone who sneaked his way into the area) might be a danger to the Jews in the shelter. In times of trouble, simple courtesies get very complicated.

    He did not discuss that most American Jews vote center left, while most Israeli Jews are now voting hard right. This is another obvious difference. But people on the hard right tend to be tribalists. In this country, tribalists tend to feel themselves threatened by immigrants. This fear is a major source of Trump’s strength. In Israel, they tend to feel threatened by their neighbors, whom they look at as wannabe immigrants. It is really, I believe, two versions of the same thing.

    One thing that did not come up was the surprising runaway victory of Zohan Mondani in the Democratic mayoral primary in New York, and his now assumed victory in the final vote in  November. A 33 year old Muslim, a founder of a chapter of a pro-Palestinian organization as an undergraduate at Bowdoin, an individual who has expressed support for the BDS movement and for penalizing American charities which provide funding which supports settlement building in the West Bank. Even though Mondani has many Jewish supporters, including at high levels, and over and over proclaims that antisemitism is an evil that must be erased, his presumed election does raise some questions that have not previously been raised in New York City politics. (Of course, Mondani is more than a pro-Palestinian Muslim; he is a self defined socialist, who wants to redirect New York City dollars in very different directions than is currently the case.)

    Is Mamdani bad for the Jews? You can’t foresee the future, but I would suspect 82 year old Jewish New Yorkers more concerned about his potential mayoral term than 48 year old Jewish New Yorkers? He may be the last mayor they will experience, while younger Jews can look beyond him to the future.

  • Water, Water Everywhere, And Not A Drop To Drink

    June 25th, 2025

    Sometimes you see a headline and just don’t know what to do with it. Today, this came up on my internet feed: “12 billion light-years from Earth, NASA has discovered a massive reservoir of water containing 140 trillion times the water on Earth.” If you are wondering where this is, it surrounds quasar APM 08279+5525, and is neither liquid nor ice, but gaseous, even though the temperature is about -63 Celsius. In case you didn’t know, this would be a little colder than -84 Fahrenheit. The quasar surrounds a black hole that has a mass equal to 20 billion suns, and the power that it throws off is “comparable to a thousand trillion stars like our sun.” This reservoir, they say, has been there since long before the Milky War was created.

    Okay, so these are big numbers, no question about that. Source? The website is paris2018.com. It looks legit, but I can’t say I know what it is.

    In order to find some other big numbers, I asked Google to tell me how many galaxies there are in the universe and Google told me that there are “an estimated 2 trillion galaxies” in the observable universe. And that there are 10 to the 24th power stars. Now if you are wondering how many stars that would really be, all I can tell you is what Google tells me: “more stars than all the grains of beach sand on planet Earth”.

    And then I asked how many black holes there are in the observable universe, and I was told (by Google again) that there are an estimated 40 quintillion. That is a number I can write out: 40,000,000,000,000,000,000. You want to know how 40 quintillion compares to 10 to the 24th power? I happen to know that (thanks again to you know who). A quintillion is only 10 to the 18th power (and a sextillion is 10 to the 21st power).

    I know you can go up to a centillion using recognized words for the numbers and then names become more speculative. I want to tell you how many zeros there are in a centillion. I thought that would be easy. But Google stumped me: “A centillion has 303 zeros in the American system. In the British system, a centillion has 600 zeros.” And, no, I am not going to ask Google the obvious follow up question.

    My 4 1/2 year old grandson is fascinated by numbers. He likes to watch two groups of videos on YouTube, “Numberblocks” and “Wonderland”. There is an episode of Numberblocks where the focus is on big, big numbers, and you go (in cartoon style with sort of an underlying plot) through all the -illion numbers, until you run out and then reach a googolplex. He tells me that this is the biggest number in the world. He is sure of it. I tell him that I know a bigger number. He doubts me. And then I tell him. It’s googolplex +1. He is stumped. He knows I am correct.

    In dictionary.com, when you look up the definition of “centillion”, you get to that part of their definition where the word is used in a sentence. For centillion, I think they have one great sentence: “In physics, one chance in a centillion is considered an impossibility because there are fewer than a centillion seconds before the end of the universe.”

    I asked Google if the universe is ever going to end. It told me yes, although the manner of its ending (bang or whimper?) is not yet agreed upon. It might end with the Big Freeze (think Kurt Vonnegut and Ice-9), it might end with the Big Rip, and it might end with the Big Crunch. And then there are those who do not believe that any of these three possibilities are in our future. There are some who believe that there will be the Big Bounce. The proponents of the Big Bounce Theory actually believe in the Big Crunch, but they think that the Big Crunch would be followed by another Bitg Bang. And that this will happen over and over, and I guess has happened over and over.

    So is this something worth thinking about? And, as they say, how does it affect the Jews? And how does it affect God and the creation story? Well for one thing, if you grew up thinking that God was all powerful, and that you knew what that meant…….you have been fooled. You had no idea what “all powerful” means.

    What got me on this kick tonight? I don’t know. But maybe it had to do with the wine tasting party that Edie and I returned from. It was a small event, featuring local educator Steve Kerbel, whom I know from the Haberman Institute, and who is an expert on Israeli wines. and it was pretty interesting. We tasting a number of different blends and I (whose wine palate is not the most refined) can tell you this. Darom by Yatir Trio Red is as good as it gets. It’s available for about $30 a bottle ($30 usually gets me two or three bottles, but none of them taste like this one). It is bottled somewhere in the Negev. And going back to big numbers, just for a second, Steve talks about some wineries in Israel that put out several hundred thousand bottles a year. He considers those large, I think, and he did describe another winery that puts out 50,000 bottles a year. That one, he said, was small.

    Tonight’s event by the way was sponsored by Americans for Ben Gurion University, a group that I still have some involvement with, but on whose board of directors I served for 20 years, including 6 years as national treasurer.

    You probably know that the university, situated in Beersheva, and Soroka Hospital, which serves its two medical schools, were bombed during what is temporarily being called the 12 Day War. Let’s hope that name sticks.

←Previous Page
1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 49
Next Page→

Blog at WordPress.com.

searching

 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Art is 80
      • Join 68 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • Art is 80
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar