How is this for a good statement (thanks, Harry Rado)?

Judge Coughenour is a Senior Judge on the United States District Court for the District of Western Washington in Seattle. He was appointed to the Court 41 years ago by a guy named Ronald Reagan.
As we get near Trump’s 100 Days, we also get near the end of Rachel Maddow’s nightly comeback on MSNBC. Last night, Rachel (I call her Rachel and if she wants to call me Art, that’s fine with me) had some frightening words. She said that she expects that Trump, losing more and more support in the polls, will not only fail to reverse course, but will double down on outlandish things. She was not more specific, but this is very different from what Lawrence O’Donnell, who follows Rachel at 10 p.m., has consistently said. He says continually: Trump will blink and back down. So who claims MSNBC does not provide diversity?
Speaking of MSNBC, there are a lot of changes afoot, as you may or may not know. The biggest change is that MSNBC and NBC are getting a divorce, although staying under the Concast umbrella. MSNBC and CNBC, along with 9 other cable channels, are being set loose to live or die under a new corporate structure. Most of their journalists will wind up in one, but not the other. How this will affect MSNBC programming in the short run is becoming clear, as a modified program schedule starts next Monday, but MSNBC in the the long run is much less clear. I hope it keeps its current identity and does not try to be more “neutral” as we have seen CNN attempt to become (very unsuccessfully, IMHO).
This raises another issue – federal finding for public radio and TV, facing a challenge in Congress. As I understand it, the funding goes to the local stations, who use the money both for local operations and for subscribing to PBS and NPR programming. So, a cut-off would be significant. Interestingly, one of the planks in the Liberal platform in yesterday’s Canadian elections was an increase in funding for Canadian public broadcasting.
Which brings me to Canada. Mark Carney, the prime minister now elected to a full term, has one person to thank for his victory, and that is Donald Trump. Trump’s full-blown attack on Canadian independence turned the country from Conservative to Liberal overnight. Yes, as Trump apparently said yesterday in an interview with The Atlantic. “…I rule the world.”
Or, I guess not. Better if he had said, “I interfere with the world.” His interference may change the world, but not in ways he would like.
Going back to Lawrence O’Donnell for a second, Trump may be blinking again on the 25% tariffs on Canadian auto parts, providing a multi year lead time to let the industry prepare for more manufacturing here. Of course, why bother if Canada becomes a state? Wouldn’t we want State of Canada to be economically strong?
Clearly, none of this makes any sense. And that leads to O’Donnell’s other consistent conclusion, that Donald Trump is mentally ill and delusional. Anyone disagree with that? And that brings us right back where we started. With Judge Coughenour.
5 responses to “Canada and MSNBC and So Much More. Really.”
could anyone even a few months ago fathom what Trump is doing to this country?
Will he and DOJ just nod their heads and ignore adverse rulings with federal marshals under the control of DOJ? Who said how many battalions does the Pope have? Are we faced with the Manchurian President?
LikeLike
time will tell
LikeLike
Brilliant!Judy Judyhpass@gmail.comSent from my iPad
LikeLike
thx
LikeLike
A few things – first there is really no such thing as a full term. We still don’t know if there is a majority government. If it is a minority government, there could be an election in under two years. There is also the possibility – though very unlikely – that the other parties could band together for a nonconfidence vote. Secondly the country did not turn Liberal. The Conservatives got more seats in Parliament than they had and won a greater share of the popular vote than previously. They also made strides in demographics that previously were not theirs. Canada like the US is very divided with a rising far right wing that, in my opinion, has borrowed style and words and policies from the MAGA crowd. To me that is very scary. One of my cousins said that with a Harris presidency there would be a Poilievre government. Probably true. ( Though of course I would have preferred a Harris presidency with Poilievre being Prime Minister. He would have been less dangerous without Trump in place. ) This was no grand victory by any means and the right wing is going nowhere and probably will continue to grow. Of course how successful or not Carney is will play a big role in what is to be. That said, I voted Liberal and am very glad Carney won.
LikeLike