I read yesterday that the average age of an MSNBC viewer is 72. Only a little over 20% of American voters are about that age. So it got me thinking…..where do younger people, and I guess I mean people under, say, 40, get their news? They don’t watch any TV or cable station in place of MSNBC; I assume the average ages are similar (although I don’t know). They don’t subscribe to newspapers. Or magazines. Most of their news they get somewhere on line, I assume, or from family or friends. From all of this, I conclude that they get their news in snippets. A Tik Tok reel, a headline from an on-line source, a comment from a friend. Snippets. And, if you get your news in snippets (“So what do you think about bombing those Venezuelen fishing vessels?” “Yeah, I heard about that. Sounds bad.”), how do you really understand anything, or – if “understand” – is too conclusionary – how do you even know enough to piece things together?
Now, I am not talking about the under 30 person who works in a field that requires them to keep up in the world, but the ordinary folk, who have no such professional need. How do they learn what is going on in the greater world and how does the lack of that skill affect their ability to define context in their lives?
Across my screen today, I got one of those posts that said something like “Five Things You Think About Upon Reaching 80”. Like most of those posts, it wasn’t worth much, but I appreciated No. 3: You find that the rest of the world has passed you by. To a great extent, that is true. But it isn’t that I regret not being a part of the world-to-come, but rather I regret that those in that world are not part of the world that I have been living in all this time.
For example, I spent a lot of time examining the results of Tuesday’s election. Did anyone under 40, who didn’t have to, do that? Okay, of course some did, but how many? Few, I bet.
But I learned a lot. I learned that, at least in the states that had something on the ballot this week, the voters didn’t think much of Donald Trump. I saw that, as to all the minority groups that began to swing towards the right over the past few years, they all pretty much swung back this week. That was especially true of the Hispanics, who I assume are tired of assuming, although they are all voting citizens (obviously), that they could be picked up and thrown in a detention facility half way across the country because they look like they might not be a citizen.
In fact, the only minority group that seemed to have moved against that tide were the Jews, who at least in New York, drifted to the right (if not away from the Democrats, because the top two mayoral candidates were both Democrats, although only one ran under the name of the party). Over 60 percent of the Jewish voters in New York City voted for Andrew Cuomo, only somewhat over 30% for Mamdani.
As an aside, let me say this: I am glad that Mamdani won the race for mayor, because otherwise I would have worked so hard on spelling his name correctly for no good reason.
As another aside, let me say this: Several paragraphs above, I used the word “screen”. That reminded me of my five year old grandson who was over here the other day and listening to his mother tell him how much screen time he could have while he was here. He was obviously not happy with her restrictions and decided to play on her sympathies, looking at her almost with tears in his eyes, saying “But I love screens!” He then paused a bit and said, to himself in a much lower tone as he looked at the floor, “But I hate people.”
I hope you saw how broad the Democratic victories were on Tuesday. Sure, you know about the governors of Virginia and New Jersey. But do you know that, in the Virginia General Assembly, the Democrats increased their one delegate advantage to an advantage of 14. And that some of those seats had not been won by a Democrat for 40 years, according to DNC Chairman Ken Martin. And then, in New Jersey, as I was watching Ali Velshi on the “Big Board” showing how Sherrill was doing county by county compared with Harris in 2024, it seemed that in every county where I looked, she was doing remarkably better, while the Republican candidate was trailing well beyond Trump.
Another example was in Pennsylvania, which had obviously gone for³ Trump in both 2016 and 2024. The only statewide elections were for either extending the terms of, or terminating, three judges. They were all selected by Democrats, and the Pennsylvania Republicans, plus the President, had campaigned to have the voters kick them out of office. All three were retained by at least, I think, two to one margins. Similarly in Georgia, there were only two statewide races being determined, both for somewhat minor positions on a state agency panel. In each of the two cases, there was a Democratic and a Republican candidate, and the Democrat won. What is so interesting about that is that these are the only two Democrats to win statewide offices in Georgia in decades.
There were also a number of mayoral races in major cities, including Cincinnati (where the losing Republican was J.D. Vance’s half-brother), Minneapolis (where the loser was an outspoken Arab-American), Pittsburgh, and Detroit. In none of those cases was a Republican elected.
But the only reason I know this (and in fact know more), is that I read the Post and Times this morning, I read the full Times set of election results, I read a number of news articles on my phone, and I had MSNBC on for close to two hours. How many people under 40 did that?
As to the mayoral election in New York, I thought there were three poor candidates. Cuomo I have disliked strongly since he was the Secretary of HUD, Sliwa had no chance, and Mamdani is, I think, too young and has said some troubling things. But Mamdani has been elected and needs everyone’s support. A number of very wealthy New Yorkers, who for understandable reasons were not supporting Mamdani and might have been supporting Cuomo, have contacted Mamdani today, congratulated him, wished him well, and asked what they could do to help. Obviously not everyone did this, and not yet, but that was both very encouraging and the right thing to do. Even Donald Trump said he wanted to help New York even thought it now had a “communist” mayor. But the Anti-Defamation League, which I think has gone off the deep end in recent years by automatically treating any anti-Israel sentiment as being antisemitic, has done the opposite. It has announced a “Mamdani Watch”, where it is going to keep it eyes on everything the mayor-elect does, and call it out when they don’t like it. What a pall on a formerly respectable and important institution.