My writing style is simple and conversational, and it does serve its purpose. But it is far from professional writing. Every once in a while I come upon a paragraph (or a book) that tells me how puerile my writing style really is. I found an example yesterday, when I picked up Farewell Espana: the World of the Sephardim Remembered by Howard Sachar, a book published in 1994 and which I read (or read through) at about that time.
Here is the first paragraph of Howard’s book (by the way, I call him Howard because I met him once at dinner at a friend’s condominium, and that’s what I called him then; he died in 2018):
“Cordoba meanders somnolently along the banks of the Guadalquivir River. A town of perhaps a quarter-million inhabitants, it is sustained by mercury and bauxite mined in a pine-clad sierra of neighboring mountains, by fruit and vegetables cultivated in an ochred checkerboard of enveloping farmland. We are in Spain’s subtropical meridian, the apex of a triangle formed by Seville, ninety miles to the southwest, and Granada, a hundred miles to the southeast. Although each city in its time once served as the capital of Andalusia, it is Cordoba that best preserves the medieval legacy. Its Mezquita, or Great Mosque, defines that heritage. A Moorish phantasmagoria of striated marble pillars and garnet-and-ivory arches, the mighty edifice was begun by Caliph Abd al-Rachman I in the mid-700s and doubled in size by the Calif Abd al-Mansur I two centuries later. Even now, the Mezquita’s crenellated walls and sculptured arcades overshadow, all but devour, the garish cruciform Renaissance cathedral recklessly carved out of its viscera by later Christian conquerors.”
There is no way I could write like that. I would have simply said: “Cordova is on the Guadalquivir River, about 100 miles from both Granada and Seville. It once had Jews and Muslims and Christians living together. There is an old mosque there with red and white striped arches that is so big that the Christians put a church inside. Very unique.”
And that is why I will never be a writer.
I am sitting here this morning at about 10 a.m. watching the Dow lose several hundred more points. It is now hovering around 46,000, which means it has lost about 10% since Trump started his war with Iran. My phone tells me that the average price of gasoline in the United States is now $3.96, which is a rise of close to 30% of what gas cost before the start of the war. Pam Bondi said that we should be talking about how Trump raised the Dow average to 50,000, and Donald Trump said that the price of gasoline in some parts of the country was now $1.95 and that everyone would get there soon.
I did watch a portion of the hearing of future HHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin yesterday and, once again, wish members of Congress were better at asking questions. Of course, I don’t know if there are internal rules that limit what questions can be asked at these hearings, but have never heard of any limits.
For example, there was a question asked to Mullin: if the president gave you an order to do something that was illegal, what would you do? Mullin’s “answer” was: the president would never ask me to do that. The questioner, a Democrat, then just let that go. I can not imagine why.
I would have asked Mullin a few simple questions. For example, I’d ask “Do you consider yourself MAGA?” No matter what his answer would be, I’d then ask him to define MAGA. I would also have asked him if he could name any areas where he and president Trump have different positions. And after that, I’d ask whether he felt that Trump has yet made any mistakes as president, and to identify them.
Mullin did say that, once he takes over HHS, there would be no entries into homes without a warrant, unless the ICE was pursuing someone who ran into a house while being pursued. That was good, but did anyone ask him if ICE and related agency personnel would stop wearing masks, would have operating body cameras, and would have identification on their uniforms and reading to show someone who requests seeing identification? If so, I didn’t hear that, and didn’t see anything reported on that.
With that in mind, I admit to being a bit confused as to why all of HHS, with the exception of ICE, has not been funded. Everyone agrees that it should be. And everyone agrees that ICE has, through the BBB, already been given enough money to carry on its activities whether or not ICE is funded for this year. So, even if the Republicans don’t want to change the practices of ICE agents (although we know from Mullin’s testimony that they will change its policy regarding the need for judicial warrants), you would think they would agree to fund the remainder of the department, and leave the ICE question to further discussions. The Republicans don’t give anything up regarding ICE by doing this, and they keep the other important activities of HHS going and HHS personnel paid for their work.
I recently read Stuart Stevens’ book The Conspiracy to End America. Stevens is a former GOP political campaign advisor, a founder of the Lincoln Project (anti-Trump Republicans), and a frequent panelist on TV. His short book is very well organized and important. He talks about disinformation, party discipline, big money in politics, political lawyers, and political demonstrations. It was published in 2023 (before the second Trump election) and I recommend it highly. It is not at all outdated.
Stuart Stevens (if in fact he wrote the book himself) writes quite well. Better than I do. But he is no Howard Sachar.